A short Lincoln-Douglas debate case (can be used as an essay), arguing the importance of nonviolence.

More and more, Ameri toilets attend to be getting false conceptions most love-in-idleness. They seem to think that, when another nation is disturbing the peace of our nation, that the still behavior to solve this problem is through fantastic means, closely notably war. This could not be further from the truth. Because I turn over that war is not the best way to solve for conflicts, I mustiness affirm todays resolution: When called upon by ones government, individuals are morally obligated to risk their lives for their country. Before I go on, I leave define key wrong in the resolution. Government is be by the Oxford English lexicon as the system by which a state or community is governed. Moral is specify by the Oxford English dictionary as standards of behaviour, or principles of remediate and wrong. Obligation is defined by the Catholic Encyclopedia as bond which by a legal necessity binds us to do something according to the laws of our State. From these def initions, we roll in the hay draw the conclusion that in order for someone to stir moral obligation, he or she must have make a conscious conclusion as to whether or not the act they plan on doing is right. If something is not considered morally right, on that point can be no moral obligation. The value I chose to uphold is individuality.

Individuality must be upheld on todays fine-tune because it is the basis for mutation in any nation, and, along with change, comes a nation that functions as a community. In diverse countries, there can be any a true(p) sense of diversity with a good sense of individua lity, or there can be diversity with no indi! viduality. When individuality is a nations lapse priority, they get a strong feeling of patriotism from the people. The criterion Im using in todays round... If you want to get a plentiful essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper