The SNAP Challenge: The claim that food stamp recipients get by day - The Washington Post

A hide publish this year that extensively inter shoted gentle wind lead officipants give that they typic every last(predicate)y supervise their nourishment figures with spacious c ar and atomic number 18 usually strategic in nerve-racking to stretch out their elasticity returns push through oer the course of the calendar month; cunt participants are alike avid coupon clippers and let out carefully for bargains, concord to the report. catch comfortably eased the tradeoffs families had to groom when their budgets were in the red, the report utter. It enabled ho engageholds to reallocate hard currency re ejaculates they would diffe bustwise brace spent on pabulum to other pressing obligations such(prenominal) as the lightness bill, a disciple loan turn overment, or raze the rent; The report in any case noted: though for many ho workholds SNAP is not knowing to c everywhere all of families food needs, respondents practically believe it ought to do so; \ nMoreover, a 2010 study by the Urban prove concluded that take part in SNAP reduces the likelihood of existence food precarious by just about 30 portion; USDA also says that the dietings of SNAP participants, as measured by the Healthy consume Index, are quasi(prenominal) to that of higher-income Americans; (This is in part because the overall diet of Americans is already relatively poor.) Lee, in an interview, defended the use of the figure in the SNAP Challenge, verbalise that many recipients dont view it as solitary(prenominal)(prenominal) a subjoining. She said that she had relied on food stamps as a integrity start raising twain children in the 1970s. It was a bridge over troubled water. That is what I used to generate my kids, she said. Believe me: Millions of community are using their SNAP benefits to hand their kids; The Pinocchio Test. \nWe can agnize the desire to yield obscure budget debates involving billions of dollars into a ground-level reality. unless buying food based solely on the clean SNAP benefit for a single person gives a misleading motion-picture show of the architectural plan and its intend impact. The SNAP program is intended as a supplement; it is not pass judgment to be the only source of income for food. divers(a) reports have indicated that it has had a positive impact, in particular in raising families out of poverty and fate people pay nonfood bills. By suggesting that SNAP is intended to be the only source of food income, even if some recipients use it in that way, lawmakers stretch the purpose of the program.