Arguments :: essays research papers

Discussions on various topics come up anywhere there is mess with certain thoughts. These discussions will come up from out of nowhere and from anywhere. When a discussion becomes a heated debate as two parties give tongue to back and forth then it is an argument. Winning those arguments, whether you know or do not know what you argon public lecture about, is a great feeling. present is how to win arguments, when you have no clue of what the argument entails, by qualification things up, using meaningless however weighty-sounding words and phrases, and by using gay comebacks.Making things up is harder than it seems. Made up phrases just cant be off the top of your head, they have to be thought out. Suppose, in a Peruvian economy argument, you are trying to prove Peruvians are underpaid, a position you base solely on the fact that YOU are underpaid, and you are damned if you are going to let a bunch of Peruvians be better off. DONT say "I think Peruvians are underpaid." Say "The middling Peruvians salary in 1981 dollars adjusted for the revised tax base is $1,452.81 per annum, which is $836.07 in front the mean gross poverty level." This second statement suggests the same thought, til now expresses it in a way that sounds more sophisticated and in travel the arguer looks better.Next, use meaningless but weighty-sounding words and phrases. To do this, a list needs to be entered into memory. Stylish words and phrases include let me define it this way, in terms of, vis--vis, per se, as it were, qua, and so to pronounce. Memorize Latin abbreviations such as "Q.E.D.," "e.g.," and "i.e." These are all short for "I speak Latin, and you do not."Heres how to use these words and phrases. Suppose you want to say "Peruvians would want to order appetizers more often, but they dont have enough money." Nobody wins arguments talking like that. But you WILL win if you say "Let me put it this way. In terms of appetizers vis--vis Peruvians qua Peruvians, they would like to order them more often, so to speak, but they do not have enough money per se, as it were. Q.E.D." and a fool would challenge that statement.Finally, use snappy and irrelevant comebacks. Having an arsenal of all-purpose irrelevant phrases to fire back at opponents when they make binding points is great for a final blow.